Legal Opinion

State v. Hites-Clabaugh

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 18, 2012No. 08C48426; A146356PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, P. J.

Defendant was convicted after a jury trial of first-degree sexual abuse. ORS 163.427. On appeal, she argues that that the trial court erred in (1) allowing a witness to whom the complainant disclosed abuse to testify without the requisite 15 days’ notice being given pursuant to OEC 803(18)(a)(b), (2) refusing to allow defendant’s expert witness to testify concerning protocols for child sexual abuse investigations and about pedophile grooming behaviors, and (3) denying her motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. In addition, defendant argues that the court erred in imposing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. SouthardOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. McClureOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. OlmsteadOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. S.P.Oregon Supreme Court · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WrightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  2. State v. DulfuCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. Burcham v. FrankeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. Dept. of Human Services v. M. T. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. State v. HenleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API