Legal Opinion

State v. Affeld

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1988No. TC CR-85-77, CA A38006, SC S35085PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*127CAMPBELL, J.

Defendant was charged with robbery in the first degree. One Newton was also charged in connection with the same incident, and the two were tried separately. Newton had been found guilty but had not been sentenced at the time of defendant’s trial. He refused to testify during the state’s case in chief and during the presentation of defendant’s evidence, claiming his Fifth Amendment right to not incriminate himself. After defendant had testified, Newton agreed to testify in rebuttal of defendant’s testimony. The circuit court allowed Newton to testify but limited the scope of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. DavidsonOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Arthur v. ParishOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  3. State v. JenkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Stillwell v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Beemer v. LenskeOregon Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. State v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. ToweryArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. OlmsteadOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. NefstadOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. BowenOregon Supreme Court · 2006

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API