Legal Opinion

Akers v. Beal Bank

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 11, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2009-0724Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARTHA A. AKERS, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 09-0724 (RMU) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 42, 47 : BEAL BANK et al., : : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; DENYING THE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE THE PLAINTIFF’S JULY 8, 2010 DECLARATION I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss based on the pro se plaintiff’s failure to participate in discovery and adequately prosecute her case. In opposing that motion, the plaintiff has filed a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brian P. Moore v. Agency for International DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  2. Weisberg v. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  3. Schmidt v. ShahDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. Wada v. United States Secret ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  5. Dixon v. Midland Mortgage Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API