Legal Opinion
Dixon v. Midland Mortgage Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 29, 2010No. Civil Action 09-1789 (RWR)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Beatrice Jiggetts brings this action against the defendant, Midland Mortgage Company (“Midland”), alleging claims of trespass, conversion, and breach of contract arising out of Midland changing the locks and foreclosing on her home. Midland moves to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), arguing that its home entry was authorized because Jiggetts defaulted on her mortgage and abandoned her home, that the law of conversion applies to personal property and not real property, and that the complaint fails to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Trudeau v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Holy Land Foundation for Relief & Development v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Kaempe, Staffan v. Myers, GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Akers v. Beal BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Chen v. Bell-SmithDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Azzam v. Rightway Development Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Akers v. Beal BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Azzam v. Rightway Development, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.