Legal Opinion
KCHM, Inc. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided August 29, 2017No. 5:17-CV-18-BOPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TERRENCE W. BOYLE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This cause comes before the Court on defendant Mid-Continent Casualty Company’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs have responded, Mid-Continent has replied, and the matter is ripe for ruling. For the reasons that follow, Mid-Continent’s motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs filed this action alleging claims for unfair or deceptive trade practices, breach of contract, breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, and for declaratory relief to determine questions of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- D.F. Pray, Inc. v. Wesco Insurance CompanyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2023
- Givens v. Erie Insurance GroupDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022
- Williams, J. v. OAO Severstal v. Tri-State SafetySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019