Combs v. Peters
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.
“An appeal, Hinnissy, is where ye ask wan coort to show its contempt f’r another coort.”
*639Notwithstanding Mr. Dooley, we have great respect for the learned trial court but conclude that there was an abuse of discretion in refusing to order a new trial on the grounds of newly discovered evidence.
The five requirements for the granting of a new trial on the grounds of newly discovered evidence are set forth in Hoffman v. Buggs (1959), 6 Wis. (2d) 488, 491, 95 N. W. (2d) 237. See also Estate of Teasdale (1953), 264 Wis. 1, 4, 58 N. W. (2d) 404; Mickoleski v. Becker (1948), 252 Wis. 307, 311, 31 N.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Teasdale v. TeasdaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Koss v. A. Geo. Schulz Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Miller Saw-Trimmer Co. v. CheshireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Fields v. CreekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Belt Line Realty Co v. DickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.