Koss v. A. Geo. Schulz Co.

The matters involved in this appeal •were exhaustively considered in Wolfgram v. Schoepke, 123 Wis. 19, 100 N. W. 1054; and we are not disposed to relax in any degree whatever the rules there laid down, nor is it necessary to repeat here what was said there. If there was no other disclosure with reference to the verdict in this case except such as is contained in the affidavits of the eleven jurors, the case would fall within the rule of Wolf-*250gram v. Schoepke, supra. There were other proceedings had in this case before the jury separated and before the jurors had an opportunity to learn from…