Legal Opinion

Smith v. United States

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided October 21, 1931No. 301, 302, 304, 315, 318PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEWEY, District Judge.

The foregoing suits are what have come to be known as war risk insurance eases. In each ease the suit was instituted by a former soldier in the military forces during the World War for recovery on a war risk insurance policy issued to him while in the service, and wherein claim is made that the soldier was, while the policy was in force, permanently and totally disabled, and recovery is sought. under the terms of the respective insurance policies in each case.

The controversy here at issue is whether this court has jurisdiction to hear and determine the issues raised by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Berntsen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
  3. Manke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
  4. United States v. BurleysonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
  5. Dobbie v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. PetersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  2. United States v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
  3. Anderson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1932
  4. Eidam v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  5. Egan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API