United States v. Burleyson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by the United States from a judgment against it on a policy of war risk insurance. The sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and judgment was challenged, in the court below on two grounds: First, because there was no competent evidence tending to show a disagreement between the Bureau and the appellee as to the claim of the latter under his contract of insurance; and, second, because the evidence was insufficient in law to support the claim of permanent and total disability.
The United States, like every other sovereign, has a right to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Berntsen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
- Manke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- United States v. PetersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- United States v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- United States v. DensmoreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- United States v. KnottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.