Legal Opinion
Manke v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 10, 1930No. 6034, 6036PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
dietrich; circuit Judge.
In respect of the single question presently involved, the two above-entitled eases are identical. In each the plaintiff seeks to recover upon a war risk insurance policy. Actions of this character against the government are authorized by section 19 of the Act of June 7, 1924, 43 Stat. 612, as amended by the Act of March 4, 1925, § 2, 43 Stat. 1302, which provision constitutes section 445 of 38 USCA. The pertinent language of the section as codified is: “In the event of disagreement as to claim under a contract of insurance between the bureau and any person or persons…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chalmers v. SheehyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- United States v. LykeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- Eckerson v. TanneyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1916
- Hill v. NerleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Arrington v. TupperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Berntsen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
- Gilbert v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- United States v. PetersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- United States v. CalveyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- United States v. KilesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.