Legal Opinion

State v. Poole

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 4, 1991No. 125, September Term, 1988PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLE, Judge.

We are asked to resolve two issues in this case: (1) whether the trial court was bound by the terms of a written plea agreement and (2) whether Maryland Rule 4-243(d) requires the trial court to record all chambers conferences at which plea agreements are discussed.

John Poole was charged in a 28 count indictment in the Circuit Court for Washington County for various narcotic offenses. Poole entered into a written plea agreement with the State whereby he would plead guilty to two counts of distributing cocaine and to two counts of maintaining a common nuisance. In return, the State…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. People v. McConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. State v. BrockmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Cuffley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Tweedy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Solorzano v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API