Legal Opinion

Tweedy v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 6, 2004No. 35, Sept. Term, 2003PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

Millard Tweedy, petitioner, appeals his sentence for possession with intent to distribute controlled dangerous substances on the grounds that the sentence was illegal because it did not conform to the plea agreement and because the trial court sentenced him in absentia. Because we find that the Circuit Court for Baltimore City imposed a sentence which exceeded the terms of the plea agreement, we shall vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.

I. Background

Petitioner was indicted by the Grand Jury for Baltimore City on the charges of possession of controlled dangerous…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Ortega-Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Bellamy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  2. Cuffley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Solorzano v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Carlini v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API