Legal Opinion

Solorzano v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 19, 2007No. 93, Sept. Term, 2006PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRaker, J.

The issue in this case is whether the Circuit Court imposed an illegal sentence because the sentence was not in accord with the plea agreement. Fausto Ediburto Solorzano, appellant, appeals from the Circuit Court’s denial of a motion to correct an illegal sentence for attempted first degree murder on the grounds that the sentence did not conform to the plea agreement. We shall hold that the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County imposed an illegal sentence because the sentence exceeded the terms of appellant’s plea agreement.

I

Appellant was indicted by the Grand Jury for Prince George’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. John Robert AndisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  5. State v. BethelOhio Supreme Court · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cuffley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Matthews v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Baines v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Carlini v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Matthews v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API