Legal Opinion

Miller v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 26, 1974No. [No. 265, September Term, 1973.]PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEldmdge, J.

O’Donnell, J., dissents and filed a dissenting opinion at page 256 infra.

Franklin Miller was indicted by the grand jury on charges of receiving a stolen car, conspiracy, larceny, unauthorized use of a vehicle, and receiving other stolen goods. As a result of “plea bargaining,” Miller agreed to plead guilty to the charge of receiving a stolen car, and the State agreed to nol pros .the other charges against him. The State also promised, as part of the bargain, to give no recommendation to the court as to sentencing or disposition of the case. The issue before us is whether, as Miller claims,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Commonwealth v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. In Re ValleMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State v. WolskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. State v. BrockmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. Ward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Sweetwine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. Boyd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. McElroy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API