Legal Opinion

Godard v. Babson-Dow Manufacturing Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 24, 1943PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

The plaintiff Charlestown Five Cents Savings Bank, hereinafter referred to as the bank, is the owner of a three-story building in Boston, the entire third floor of which is occupied by the plaintiff Godard, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, under a written lease, the second floor being occupied by the defendant under a written lease. Each plaintiff brought a bill in equity on February 6, 1942, seeking to enjoin the defendant from maintaining an alleged nuisance in the building. The suits were referred to a master in whose report the following facts appear.

The building in question is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Harrisonville v. W. S. Dickey Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Sawyer v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  3. Highland v. Russell Car & Snow Plow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Stevens v. Rockport Granite Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Gorey v. GuarenteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Air Technology Corp. v. General Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  2. Krebiozen Research Foundation v. Beacon Press, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  3. Godard v. Babson-Dow Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  4. Schaffer v. LeimbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  5. Pendoley v. FerreiraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API