Legal Opinion

Pendoley v. Ferreira

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 7, 1963PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

Residents of Topsfield by this bill in equity seek to enjoin the defendants (the Ferreiras) from conducting nearby in B oxford a piggery which the plaintiffs contend constitutes a nuisance. They also seek damages. The case was referred to a master, whose report was confirmed. The plaintiffs and the Ferreiras have appealed from the final decree which permanently enjoined the Ferreiras “from operating their piggery ... in such an unreasonable manner as to cause a stench to emanate therefrom which materially interferes with reasonable enjoyment of the property of a large number of people living…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Stewart v. FinkelstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  2. Stevens v. Rockport Granite Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Nickerson v. DowdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  4. Kasper v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Cumberland Corp. v. MetropoulosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Yeager and Sullivan, Inc. v. O'NEILLIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Robichaux v. HuppenbauerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  4. Building Inspector of Mansfield v. CurvinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1963

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API