Legal Opinion

Air Technology Corp. v. General Electric Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 10, 1964PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

The plaintiff (AT) brought this bill in equity (1) to restrain the defendant (GE) from using information supplied to it by AT in connection with an Air Force project (the 477L project), (2) to obtain a declaration that GE has committed breaches of a fiduciary relation to AT, and (3) for damages. A master’s report was confirmed by an interlocutory decree from which GE appealed. Both AT and GE appealed from a final decree which awarded to AT $128,734 plus interest and costs, but denied injunctive relief.

At some time after 1957, the Air Force undertook the 477L project to establish installations…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Harrisonville v. W. S. Dickey Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Cardullo v. LandauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Atacs Corporation Airtacs Corporation, in 97-1812 v. Trans World Communications, Inc., in 97-1813. Nos. 97-1812, 97-1813Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  3. Schwanbeck v. Federal-Mogul Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  4. Zimmerman v. BogoffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  5. Szalla v. LockeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API