Legal Opinion
Godard v. Babson-Dow Manufacturing Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 8, 1946PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
The final decree after rescript entered on March 12, 1943, in Godard v. Babson-Dow Manuf. Co. 313 Mass. 280, restrained the continuance of a nuisance consisting of noise and vibration. The plaintiff in that case, on April 16, 1943, brought this petition in the Superior Court against the Babson-Dow Manufacturing Company and two of its officers, praying that they be adjudged in contempt for disobedience to that final decree. On June 7, 1943, the respondents were adjudged in contempt, and on August 26, 1943, the matter was referred to a master to find the damages suffered by the petitioner…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Nye v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Fox v. Capital Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- McCrone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Lamb v. CramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Commonwealth v. Town of HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Furtado v. FurtadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Darmetko v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- United Factory Outlet, Inc. v. Jay's Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Commonwealth v. McHughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.