Legal Opinion
O'CONNELL v. Zimmerman
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 1958No. Civ. 9318PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WARNE, J., pro tem. *
This is an appeal by Frank and Bertha Zimmerman from a judgment in favor of the respondent, Charles S. Moore, for specific performance, allowing Moore damages for wrongful withholding of real property and for certain rentals and also allowing the respondent, Daniel E. O’Connell, costs incurred as escrow attorney and an attorney fee.
The appellants, Frank and Bertha Zimmerman, entered into an agreement whereby they agreed to sell to the respondent, Charles S. Moore, a business known as “Frank & Ma’s Houseful of Fun” located in the City of Irwin, together with the fixtures,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Simmons v. California Institute of TechnologyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Pacific Wharf & Storage Co. v. Standard American Dredging Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Patterson v. DonnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Traiman v. RappaportCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930
- Conner v. Bank of BakersfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Ellis v. CassidyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Ellis v. CassidyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Gilbert A. Cuneo v. Donald H. RumsfeldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.