Green v. Thornton
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from -an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a new trial. J. M. Sea-well, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. The action is -to qMet title to the premises in question situated in San Mateo county. In addition to the usual allegations in a complaint in such ac tion, the plaintiff avers, among other things, that on the first day of April, 1872, B. S. Green, since deceased, then the husband of plaintiff, was the owner and in possession of th'e lands and premises in question, and was then indebted to one John McCombe in a large sum of money; that on said date an action was commenced by said McCombe against said Green and the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Robinson v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Hyde v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Hyde v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Robinson v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Estate of BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Martin v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Conner v. Bank of BakersfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- People v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.