United States v. Under Seal
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WIDENER, Circuit Judge:
The district court in this case granted Movant’s motion to quash subpoenas issued by two grand juries with respect to certain papers in its possession on the grounds of attorney-client privilege or work-product privilege, or both, and held that the Government had not established a prima facie case for the crime-fraud-tort exception to the attorney-client privilege. 734 F.Supp. 1206. It also held that the Government was, nevertheless, on the ground of necessity, entitled to certain statements of witnesses contained in the papers otherwise subject to the work-product…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Martin SchwimmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- In re LTV Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
- Continental Oil Company, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Transmirra Products Corp. v. Monsanto Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sandberg v. Virginia Bankshares, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Federal Election Commission v. Christian CoalitionDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
- Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Excess InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
- Front Royal Insurance v. Gold Players, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1999
- BCR Safeguard Holding, LLC v. Morgan Stanley Real Estate Advisor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.