Legal Opinion
Continental Oil Company, a Corporation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 27, 1964No. 19044_1PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Circuit Judge.
After this matter had been submitted, the court was of the view that the circumstances here were such as to require an immediate ruling. Accordingly this court stated the facts in the matter and announced its decision in a preliminary order reading as follows:
“In this matter the court has been advised that a prompt decision is important. As noted shortly, the facts rose out of subpoenas issued in aid of a Federal Grand Jury proceeding in Phoenix, Arizona. It is the information of the court that the life of the Grand Jury will terminate shortly and we therefore consider…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- La Buy v. Howes Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Perlman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Levine v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Eisenberg v. GagnonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- In Re Claus Von Bulow, Martha Von Bulow, by Her Next Friends Alexander Auersperg, and Annie Laurie Auersperg-Kneissl v. Claus Von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Robert McPartlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- United States v. (Under Seal)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- In re LTV Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.