Legal Opinion
Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Excess Insurance
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided November 8, 2000No. CIV. A. 2:-99-CV-389PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KING, United States Magistrate Judge.
This is a diversity action, 28 U.S.C. § 1332, for breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and declaratory judgment arising out of the alleged refusal by defendant to pay to plaintiff amounts allegedly due and owing under certain reinsurance agreements with respect to asbestos losses paid or expected to be paid by plaintiff pursuant to primary liability insurance policies issued by plaintiff to Owens-Corning Fiberglas [“OCF”]. Second Amended Complaint. This matter is now before the Court on defendant’s…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Boyd v. Comdata Network, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- Schaeffler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc. v. PaasDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2007
- Selby v. O'DeaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
- Selby v. O'DeaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.