Legal Opinion
Maresca v. Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 23, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-0226PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
Joseph Maresca challenges the Patent and Trademark Office’s (“PTO”) decision denying his application to take the examination for registration to practice before the PTO. Before the Court are petitioner’s motion for summary judgment and respondents’ motion for summary judgment. The Court finds that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that judgment should be entered for the respondents.
I. BACKGROUND
On October 28, 1991, Mr. Maresca filed with the Office of Enrollment and Discipline (“OED”) a request for admission to the April 1992 Patent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Melissa Hines, on Behalf of Her Minor Daughter, Amber Sevier v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Gager v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1963
- Leeds v. MosbacherDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cornish v. DudasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Halvonik v. KapposDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Blackwell v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Cornish v. DudasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Halvonik v. KapposDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.