Legal Opinion

Cornish v. Dudas

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 4, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2007-1719Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________ ) CORNELL D.M. JUDGE CORNISH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 07-1719 (RWR) ) JON DUDAS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pro se plaintiff Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish brings this action against the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) and its Director and two employees in their official capacities. Among other things, he alleges a violation of the Rehabilitation Act, and challenges as arbitrary, capricious and discriminatory the USPTO’s decision to…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API