Legal Opinion

Gager v. Ladd

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 15, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 732-62PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, District Judge.

This is an action brought by plaintiff in proper person for a mandatory injunction to compel the defendant, Commissioner of Patents, to admit the plaintiff to the next regularly scheduled examination for admission to practice before the United States Patent Office, and furthermore, that plaintiff be admitted to an examination of no greater complexity or no greater degree of difficulty than those heretofore given. Jurisdiction is based upon 35 U.S.C. § 32, and *672Local Civil Rule 95. The facts are not in dispute. During the past several years the plaintiff properly applied…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kingsland v. DorseySupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Cupples v. MarzallDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1952

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Maresca v. Commissioner of Patents & TrademarksDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994
  2. Philip A. Premysler v. Bruce A. Lehman, Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  3. Hsuan-Yeh Chang v. KapposDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  4. Philip A. Premysler v. Bruce A. Lehman, Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API