Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Union Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 16, 1941No. 10009PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
In a proceeding conducted pursuant to Section 10 of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160, the Board found that respondent discharged and refused to reinstate Frank Barker because of his union activities, and because he gave testimony against the company in a proceeding under the Act, thereby violating Section 8 (1), (3), and (4) of the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158 (1, 3, 4). Upon these finding's it ordered respondent to cease and desist from such unfair labor practices, to offer Barker reinstatement with back pay, and to post appropriate notices.
The sole…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Appalachian Electric Power Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- Martel Mills Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Thompson Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Tennessee Coach Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Miami Coca-Cola Bottling CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Stonewall Cotton Mills, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
- Interlake Iron Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- National Labor Relations Board v. Fulton Bag & Cotton MillsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.