Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Tung Corp. of America
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 26, 1940PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLY, District Judge.
Securities and Exchange Commission, hereinafter referred to as the Commission, has filed its petition alleging that the Commission had reasonable grounds to believe that respondent Tung Corporation of America was engaged in dealing in unregistered securities and praying that respondent corporation and George Vasen, its secretary, be required to show cause why an order should not be entered directing them to appear before some officer designated by the petitioner and produce documentary evidence mentioned in a certain subpoena duces tecum theretofore issued under the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Badders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Public Clearing House v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- New York Life Insurance v. Deer Lodge CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Perkins v. Endicott Johnson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Los Angeles Trust Deed & Mortgage Exchange v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Blackwell v. BentsenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. PayneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.