Legal Opinion

Badders v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 6, 1916No. 521PublishedCited by 271 opinions

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. The facts, which involve the construction and constitutionality of § 215, Criminal Code, and ...the validity of a conviction and sentence thereunder, are stated in the opinion.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. The facts, which involve the construction and constitutionality of § 215, Criminal Code, and ...the validity of a conviction and sentence thereunder, are stated in the opinion. Mr. James H. Harkless, with whom Mr. D. R. Hite and Mr. Clifford Histed were on the brief, for plaintiff in.error: Section 215 of the Criminal Code as applied to the indictment, trial and conviction of the defendant, is unconstitutional and void. As interpreted by the trial court, § 215 encounters that provision^ the Constitution which…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This case is brought to this court from the District Court under § 238 of the Judicial Code, Act qf March 3,' 1911,- c. 231; 36 Stat. 1087, 1167, on the ground that it involves the construction and application of the Constitution of the United States, The plaintiff in error was indicted for placing letters in the mail for the purpose of executing a scheme to defraud devised by him, in violation of § 215 of the Criminal Code, Act of March 4,1909, c. 321; 35 Stat. 1088, 1130. There were twelve counts, on seven of which, each relating to a different letter, he was found guilty. He was sentenced…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Lottery CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Ebeling v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by271 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Isassi v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  5. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

266 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API