Legal Opinion

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Payne

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 15, 1940PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONGER, District Judge.

This is a motion by the plaintiff for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. The plaintiff instituted the within civil action pursuant to Section 20(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (48 Stat. 74, 15 U.S.C.A. § 77a et seq.), for an injunction restraining the defendant from further violation of Section 5 (a) of that Act.

The sole question is whether or not the within documents may be considered a “security”. There is no question raised here as to the merits or demerits of defendant’s business…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Universal Service Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Crude Oil Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Tung Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1940

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. The Johns Hopkins University v. William E. HuttonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  4. Singleton v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. In Re Caesars Palace Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API