Legal Opinion

W. S. Tyler Co. v. Rebic

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1928No. 20901PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The questions presented here are, first, whether the appeal from the denial of the claim of Rebic by the Industrial Commission was governed by Section 1465-90, General Code, as amended in 111 Ohio Laws, p. 227, effective July 14,1925, or whether it is controlled by said section as it existed prior to said date; and, second, whether or not the employee had the right to give oral testimony in the trial of the appeal in the court of common pleas.

If the so-called oral application of June 6, 1925, by Rebic to his employer for compensation is sufficient to constitute a “pending proceeding” within…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. VailOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Industrial Commission v. HilshorstOhio Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Texas Steel Co. v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. State ex rel. Gatlin v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Kaiser v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Lewis v. TrimbleOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Noggle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1935

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API