Colvocoresses v. W. S. Wasserman Co.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor:
The complainant, by his petition, seeks to compel the defendant company, through its officers, to answer, under oath, certain interrogatories attached thereto, and to produce certain documentary evidence referred to in such petition and in a schedule likewise- attached thereto. The complainant not only alleges that the facts, which he seeks to have disclosed, and the documents, which he seeks to have produced, are within the knowledge of the defendant and its officers, but that they are material and relevant to the proof of his case. See Langdell’s Equity Pleading, 244.
The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Martin v. D. B. Martin Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1913
- Luten v. CampDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1915
- P. M. Co. v. Ajax Rail Anchor Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1914
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Skelly Oil Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1926
- Wolcott v. National Electric Signaling Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hardenbergh v. BothSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955