Ross v. St. Paul Reinsurance Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hines, Justice.
This Court granted certiorari to the Court of Appeals in St. Paul Reinsurance Co. v. Ross, 266 Ga. App. 75 (596 SE2d 193) (2004), to *93determine whether the Court of Appeals was correct in holding that the question of whether an insurance policy provided coverage for a tort judgment debtor could not be litigated in a garnishment action against the judgment debtor’s insurer. Finding that the Court of Appeals erred, we reverse.
After a shooting in the parking lot of a nightclub owned by Jeff Akhtar injured the Rosses’ son, the Rosses were awarded a judgment against Akhtar in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Francis v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Southern Guaranty Insurance v. DowseSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Southern General Insurance v. RossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. CrumpCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Dowse v. Southern Guaranty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- ST. PAUL REINSURANCE CO., LTD. v. RossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Hix v. Hertz Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Builders Insurance v. TenenbaumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Builders Insurance v. Sheldon U. TenenbaumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Tanekkia HarrisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2020