Legal Opinion
ST. PAUL REINSURANCE CO., LTD. v. Ross
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 28, 2005No. A03A2304, A03A2305PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bernes, Judge.
In Ross v. St. Paul Reinsurance Co., 279 Ga. 92 (610 SE2d 57) (2005), the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed our previous decision in these consolidated appeals arising out of a garnishment action brought by Shirley and Ronald Ross against St. Paul Reinsurance Company, Ltd. in the State Court of DeKalb County. See St. Paul Reinsurance Co. v. Ross, 266 Ga. App. 75 (596 SE2d 193) (2004). In reversing this Court, the Supreme Court held that a tort judgment creditor has standing to bring a garnishment action seeking recovery of all or part of the judgment from the insurer of the tort…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Richmond v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Shadix v. Carroll CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Jefferson Insurance Co. of New York v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Nodvin v. WestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- First Specialty Insurance v. FlowersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- TAYLOR, EXR. v. THE DEVEREUX FOUNDATION, INC. (And Vice Versa)Supreme Court of Georgia · 2023
- TBF FINANCIAL, LLC v. HoustonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Hann v. Harpers Boutiques InternationalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Camacho v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.