Legal Opinion

Dowse v. Southern Guaranty Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 22, 2003No. A03A1459PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Following the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Southern Guaranty Insurance Company (“SGIC”) in this garnishment action, Robert and Ursula Dowse (“the Dowses”) appeal, arguing that the trial court erred in holding (1) that Ulysses Cutter, Sr. Plaster & All Texture Stucco Company, Inc. (“Cutter, Inc.”), the defendant in the underlying action, was fully released by a settlement agreement, and (2) that the insurance policy could not be garnished because Cutter, Inc. was not legally obligated to pay the Dowses’ claim, and also arguing (3) that questions of fact…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Red Giant Oil Co. v. LawlorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  2. Metcalf v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Pruyn v. Agricultural InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Globe Indemnity Co. v. BlomfieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  5. Lackey v. McDowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Southern Guaranty Insurance v. DowseSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  2. Barnum v. Coastal Health Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Brownstone Homes Condominium Ass'n v. Brownstone Forest Heights, LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  4. In re HaydenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2012
  5. J. Smith Lanier & Co. v. Acceptance Indemnity InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API