Legal Opinion

Southern Guaranty Insurance v. Dowse

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 25, 2004No. S04G0282PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEARS, Presiding Justice.

Certiorari was granted to consider whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that an insurer that refused to defend or indemnify its insured was estopped from subsequently arguing that a settlement agreement entered into by the insured and a third party relieved the insurer from its obligations under the policy. Having reviewed the record, we agree with the Court of Appeals’ ruling, but emphasize that the insurer is not estopped from arguing that the claims brought against its insured are not covered under the policy’s terms. Therefore, while we affirm the ruling…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCraney v. Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. of Conn.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Empire Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. United States Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  4. Dowse v. Southern Guaranty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Ingram v. Star Touch Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Hoover v. Maxum Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  2. Old Republic Insurance Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  3. UniFund Financial Corp. v. DonaghueCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Trinity Outdoor, LLC v. Central Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  5. Yeomans & Associates Agency, Inc. v. Bowen Tree Surgeons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API