Legal Opinion

State v. Siegfried

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 8, 1978No. 49426PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a pretrial appeal by the state pursuant to Rule 29.03, subd. 1, Rules of Criminal Procedure, from an order of the district court suppressing evidence in a prosecution of defendant for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute and possession of marijuana in excess of 1.5 ounces. The court suppressed the evidence because it concluded that the affidavit in support of the warrant application relied primarily upon hearsay information which failed to meet the veracity prong of the so-called two-pronged Aguilar test. We reverse and remand for trial.

The key cases bearing on our…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  3. Olson v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State v. CarterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  5. State v. ElingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API