Furino v. City of Lansing
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.
The question presented by this appeal is whether there is any testimony to sustain the find ing of the department that plaintiff’s injury arose out of and in the course of his employment. He was one of several employees engaged by the city of Lansing in its street work. Their regular midday hour off from work was from 11:30 a. m. to 12:30 p. m. On the day of the accident plaintiff and two of the other employees seemingly left the place where they were working very shortly before 11:30 a. m., and started in the automobile of their foreman, Henry Leeper, to go some distance to the city shed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Hills v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Haller v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Hopkins v. Michigan Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Konopka v. Jackson County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Chrysler v. Blue Arrow Transport LinesMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Daniel v. Murray Corp. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Pauley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Jensen v. Manning & Brown, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1947
- MacK v. Reo Motors, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.