MacK v. Reo Motors, Inc.
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentBlack, J.
Due proceedings under the workmen’s compensation act resulted in an award for plaintiff and application by defendants for review by certiorari. The application having been granted — quite improvidently in my view — we are confronted with question whether the compensation commission exceeded its authority by holding that the plaintiff employee’s accidental injury, sustained by her on the defendant employer’s premises during noon intermission, is compensable. The facts are typical of employee intermission eases, as will presently appear.
January 1, 1956, the writer became an associate member of…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Steiner v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Bricker v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Mitchell v. King Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Hills v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- People v. TurnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Sheppard v. Michigan National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Crilly v. BallouMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Whetro v. AwkermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
- Dyer v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.