Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. Fidelity Security Life Insurance

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1995No. 94-CV-1607PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

This case presents the issue whether a default judgment obtained without proper service of process must be vacated on the motion of a defendant who had personal knowledge of the action. Appellee Fidelity Security Life Insurance filed a complaint against appellant James McLaughlin seeking relief for McLaughlin’s alleged violations of a consent decree previously entered in the Superior Court. 1 Fidelity attempted to serve McLaughlin by delivering a copy of the summons and complaint to McLaughlin’s counsel in the prior matter. After McLaughlin did not answer the complaint or otherwise appear to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Combs v. Nick Garin TruckingCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  2. Starling v. Jephunneh Lawrence & AssociatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Schwarz v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  4. Clark v. MolerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Jones v. HuntDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Prudential FinancialDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  2. Kopff v. World Research Group, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  3. Miranda v. ContrerasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Bulin v. SteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Jones v. HershDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API