Legal Opinion
Jones v. Hersh
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 25, 2004No. 03-CV-223PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
Michelle A. Jones appeals from the denial of her Rule 60(b)(4) motion to vacate a default judgment. The judgment was entered against her in an action for the possession of real estate brought by her landlord, appellee Carl Hersh. Jones contends that the judgment was void for two reasons. First, Jones argues that the court never acquired personal jurisdiction over her because she was not served properly with the summons and complaint. Alternatively, Jones argues that the court acted without authority because it entered the judgment without requiring ex parte proof…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Dewey v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- V. T. A., Inc. v. Airco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- Combs v. Nick Garin TruckingCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Clarence Austin v. Otis SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Threatt v. WinstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Olivarius v. Stanley J. Sarnoff Endowment for Cardiovascular Science, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Luna v. A.E. Engineering Services, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Ernest v. MorrisSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
- Carrasco v. THOMAS D. WALSH, INC.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.