Fox Meadow Estates, Inc. v. Culley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
In 1922 the board of trustees of the village -of Scarsdale, after careful study, adopted a Building Zone Ordinance. The primary purpose was to preserve in the main the purely residential character of this village. There were in the village no industrial plants, one hotel, some business establishments and a few multiple houses or apartments, all of which, through the process of natural selection of sites, were in the vicinity of the Scarsdale and Heathcote railroad stations. Already a considerable portion of the village was occupied by single family residences with ample grounds, built under…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Matter of Wulfsohn v. BurdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
3Cited by36 opinions
- Shepard v. Village of SkaneatelesNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Berenson v. Town of New CastleNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Baddour v. City of Long BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Nehrbas v. Incorporated Village of Lloyd HarborNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Kiges v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.