Baddour v. City of Long Beach
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtRippey, J.
Plaintiff asks for judgment in this action declaring that the zoning ordinances of the city of Long Beach do not prohibit the use of the premises at 116 Magnolia boulevard as a rooming and boarding house, but, if they do, that the ordinances are beyond the power of the city to enact and enforce. The expressly declared and ultimate purpose of the action is to restrain the city from interfering with the use of the premises in question for the purpose of operating thereon a rooming and boarding house as a business. We limit our decision, as we must, to the issue as framed and to the relief…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Matter of Wulfsohn v. BurdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Dowsey v. Village of KensingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Village of Carthage v. . FrederickNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Lincoln Trust Co. v. Williams Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Shepard v. Village of SkaneatelesNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Diocese of Rochester v. Planning BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Matter of 440 E. 102nd St. Corp. v. MurdockNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Florentine v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Carter v. City of BluefieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.