Legal Opinion

Shepard v. Village of Skaneateles

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 1949PublishedCited by 162 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.

An amendment to a zoning ordinance of the Village of Skaneateles converted the área in which plaintiffs’ property was located from mercantile to residential uses. Asserting that the change was unreasonable and confiscatory, plaintiffs sought a declaratory judgment declaring that the amendment was unconstitutional and void. The court at Special Term, concluding that the ordinance as amended was valid, dismissed the complaint on motion of defendants, the village and its board of trustees. The Appellate Division reversed and directed entry of a declaratory judgment in plaintiffs’ favor.

Upon…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Matter of Otto v. SteinhilberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Matter of Wulfsohn v. BurdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Dowsey v. Village of KensingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. People Ex Rel. Fordham Manor Reformed Church v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by162 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. Village of TarrytownNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Fred F. French Investing Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Golden v. Planning Board of RamapoNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Ellentuck v. KleinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  5. Asian Americans for Equality v. KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1988

157 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API