Hammond v. Borgwardt
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern. County and from an order refusing a new trial. J. W. Mahon, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinión of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
—This action was brought to recover possession of two hundred pairs of shoes seized by the defendants as sheriff and deputy sheriff as the property of Edmund Hammond, Jr. The court below granted judgment for defendants, and the plaintiffs appeal from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.
The shoes in question were part of a stock oí goods in a store in which a mercantile business was carried on under the name of Hammond & Co., and the attachment was levied on the twenty-first day of June, 1897; and the court found that from the tenth day of December, 1896, until the…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Doudell v. ShooCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Auditorium Co. v. BarsottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Blinn v. RitchieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929