Blinn v. Ritchie
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HAHN, J., pro tem.
In the action which gives rise to this appeal, which was originally filed in the Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles, the complaint is cast in the form of a common count alleging that the plaintiff! had performed certain services “for and at the request of the defendants” and the reasonable value thereof. The title of the action, as it appears in the caption of the complaint, reads as follows: “Irving L. Blinn, Plaintiff, vs. James Bitchie and Joseph F. Knopf, individually, James Bitchie and Joseph F. Knopf, copartners doing business under the fictitious name and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Doudell v. ShooCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- MacLay Company v. MeadsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Hammond v. BorgwardtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by3 opinions
- Weiner v. FleischmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Lyon v. MacQuarrieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Kloke v. PongratzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940