Auditorium Co. v. Barsotti
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court óf the City and County of San Francisco. E. P. Shortall, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
This action was commenced by the plaintiff against the defendants, who were alleged to be partners doing business under the firm name and style of the “Western Metropolitan Grand Opera Co.,” to recover the aggregate sum of $9,739.86 upon three separate counts, the first and second being upon accounts stated for the sums of $2,490.34 and $4,949.52, respectively, and the third count being for money had and received in the sum of two thousand three hundred dollars. The defendant D’Avigneau defaulted, and the action as to him was later dismissed. The defendants Barsotti and Patrizi answered…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coward v. ClantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Cadenasso v. AntonelleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Vanderhurst, Sanborn, & Co. v. De WittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Title Insurance and Trust Co. v. GriderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Gille Hardware & Iron Co. v. HarrisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Spier v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Millar v. SemlerOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Holmes v. LernerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Central Heights Improvement Co. v. Memorial Parks, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Singleton v. FullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.