Legal Opinion

Meils v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 12, 1984No. C4-83-1022PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COYNE, Justice.

By writ of certiorari, relator Marilyn Miels seeks review of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals’ denial of her claim for death benefits following her husband’s suicide. The Court of Appeals overturned the compensation judge’s award of benefits to relator and her two minor children. We reverse and remand for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

I

The decedent Howard Miels was employed as a combination man by respondent Northwestern Bell Telephone Company (Bell) at Mora, Minnesota. His job required strenuous physical labor including cable splicing, trench…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sponatski's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  2. Schwartz v. TalmoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Whitehead v. Keene Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1949
  4. Brenne v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Anderson v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. WickaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  2. SAPKO v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  3. Kostelac v. Feldman's, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  4. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division v. RamseyWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. WickaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API