Legal Opinion

Brenne v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1968PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

The trial court directed the commission to reconsider the rule established in Barber v. Industrial Comm. (1942), 241 Wis. 462, 6 N. W. 2d 199. It is our conclusion that this should be done.

The particular statute involved is sec. 102.03, Stats., entitled Conditions of liability, which provides as follows:

“(1) Liability under this chapter shall exist against an employer only where the following conditions concur:
“(d) Where the injury is not intentionally self-inflicted.”

We deem the historical background and development of the law relating to workmen’s compensation death benefits from suicide to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sponatski's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  2. Daniels v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. Whitehead v. Keene Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1949
  4. Burnight v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Barber v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Petty v. Associated Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Lisney v. LIRCWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Vande Zande v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Oliver v. Travelers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  5. Lentz v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API