Legal Opinion

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Wicka

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 30, 1991No. C4-90-312PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARDEBRING, Justice.

This case raises two issues, the first legal and the second evidentiary, involving whether an intentional act exclusion of a homeowner’s liability policy applies to the conduct of an insured who, because of mental illness, may lack the capacity to form the intent to injure. In light of public policy favoring coverage where the injury threatens the general public, we construe the policy language as providing coverage where, because of mental illness, the insured’s act is the product of a failure of the insured’s volitional or cognitive capacities.

I

On the early…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. People v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Ruvolo v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  4. Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. v. O'Connor & HannanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Allstate Insurance v. BarronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  3. State v. NetlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  4. Allstate Insurance v. RaynorWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. R.W. v. T.F.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API